Britain abandoned coronavirus testing because the outbreak was too big

Britain abandoned coronavirus testing in March because the outbreak was already TOO BIG, Public Health England officials admit in tense showdown with MPs

  • Public Health England bosses were grilled by MPs on Science committee today
  • Professor Yvonne Doyle and Professor John Newton defended PHE’s actions
  • They said they only advise Department of Health, which takes major decisions 
  • More than a third of at-home coronavirus tests may never be sent back
  • Professor Newton said the public shouldn’t buy Superdrug antibody tests 
  • Here’s how to help people impacted by Covid-19

The UK abandoned coronavirus testing in March because the outbreak was already out of control and hundreds of thousands of people were infected, officials have admitted.

Public Health England bosses, who were grilled by MPs this morning, admitted that officials wanted to follow the strategy of South Korea to keep a lid on the pandemic.

But shortly after the February there were ‘many hundreds of thousands’ of people infected with COVID-19 and trying to test them all would have been futile.

At the time the Government was managing to test fewer than 2,000 people per day.

As a result, directors at Public Health England said, it was ‘not worthwhile’ to continue trying to find and isolate every case of COVID-19 and officials.

The chief medical officer for England, Professor Chris Whitty, publicly announced on March 12 that the Government would no longer test anyone outside of hospitals.

The Government has been heavily criticised for building its testing capacity too slowly, with experts saying better testing could have helped to contain the virus and save lives.  

Current testing efforts are on a much greater scale but PHE this morning revealed that huge numbers of people sent home testing kits are not returning them.

The posted kits are counted as a test in the Government’s much-heralded daily numbers, but Professor John Newton, director of health improvement at PHE, could only say ‘certainly more than half’ of the tests are currently returned to the lab. 

A revealing meeting with MPs on Parliament’s Science and Technology also found:

  • Professor John Newton admitted huge numbers of home testing kits are not being returned to labs from members of the public, saying only that the return rate was ‘certainly more than half’; 
  • Public Health England has refused to give MPs some of the scientific papers it submitted to SAGE, despite repeated requests;
  • Conservative MP Greg Clark accused PHE of ‘a degree of opacity of the basis on which decisions were made to pursue our testing strategy’;
  • PHE passed the buck on various decisions, from that of stopping public testing, of refusing the help of private laboratories, and of how to count the number of tests – all these decisions, bosses said, were taken by the Department of Health;
  • Professor John Newton, PHE’s testing tsar, urged members of the public not to buy antibody tests from Superdrug or any other private companies selling them;
  • The door is still open for possible ‘immunity certificates’ when scientists understand whether people are safe from re-infection after recovering;
  • School reopenings should be taken on an individual basis, Professor Doyle said, with some schools ready earlier than others. 

Professor Yvonne Doyle and Professor John Newton were today grilled by MPs and defended Publlic Health England’s actions throughout the COVID-19 pandemic, saying the Department of Health took the major decisions while PHE provided specialist advice

South Korea has earned global acclaim for its policy of intensively testing and isolating everyone in the population suspected of having COVID-19.

This means the cases there have been contained to relatively small areas and the number of them is extremely low (around 11,000 confirmed cases).

Britain had wanted to follow the same strategy but, by the time officials realised the virus was spreading in the UK, it was already too late.

Professor Doyle said today that ‘mass contact tracing needed to cease in March’.

She explained: ‘It was a decision that was come to because of the sheer scale of cases in the UK which had been introduced by multiple introductions, particularly after half term, from European countries we now know had large amounts of prevalence themselves.’

Professor Doyle is believed to be referring to Italy in this point – it was around half-term that the outbreak in the country’s Alpine ski resorts took hold and rattled Britain’s schools, many of which had sent pupils there on trips during the week off.

‘So we had multiple introductions,’ Professor Doyle added, ‘with many hundreds of thousands of people in March who had now been exposed to this virus in this country.

‘So contact tracing could not possibly have had the capacity to address that and, with the capacity of lab testing and our contact tracers, we felt the most important thing to do was to focus on where there was national concern, which was the capacity of the NHS, to accrue that testing.’ 

On March 12 Professor Chris Whitty announced that the Government was stopping testing of members of the public for COVID-19.

Until then, its policy was to test everyone suspected of having the virus if they had been to a country where cases had been confirmed.

But as the outbreak spiralled out of control, the Government decided to only test people who were in hospital as patients or staff.

That persisted until late April, when officials began to widen the criteria again.

Home tests are now available but Professor John Newton said he didn’t know how many people who ordered them were actually returning them to the labs.

When asked directly what the return rate is, Professor Newton hesitated before saying: ‘Certainly more than half.’

Asked again by Greg Clark, chair of the meeting, Professor Newton added: ‘I’m afraid I don’t have that figure.’

Professor Newton and Professor Doyle were grilled by politicians on the committee, who accused PHE of being ‘opaque’ about decisions being made by Government.

Mr Clark said that documents promised to the committee weeks ago had still not been given to MPs, despite having been used to inform SAGE, which advises Downing Street.

In the meeting Professor Doyle repeatedly refused calls from Mr Clark to send them all of the documents that had informed the decision to stop mass testing and tracing.

Mr Clark said: ‘A commitment was given to provide that assessment, that contemporary assessment, many weeks have gone by, it hasn’t been provided.’

Professor Newton said some of the information was in the public domain in documents that were published on PHE’s website.

He added that there had been a discussion in the Scientific Advisory Group for Emergencies (SAGE) which established that it would “not be worthwhile” to continue contact tracing once community transmission took hold in the UK.  

‘There was discussion in fact with SAGE in February,’ Professor Newton said, ‘which established that when community transmission was established in the country that it would not be worthwhile to carry on with contact tracing, which is in fact the South Korean model. 

‘When in March it became apparent that community transmission was occurring and we had multiple injections, introductions from different countries in the UK that decision was then enacted. 

‘It was a decision of course of Government, informed by all its advisers not just Public Health England.’

Source: Read Full Article